|
The two worlds of Marie
Curie
a
bright beacon of science
Jim and Rhoda Morris
http://www.scitechantiques.com/
781 245 2897
Marie Curie caught in the act of critically inspecting her
equipment to check that it is right ----hinting that the way of her work was
so much more than just radium. The total of this
young lady's discoveries have affected the future of all living
things in both negative and positive ways, not the alpha and beta
particles,
but the ones symbolized by her ever present wash bottle bisecting her
face. One side is bright, cautiously hopeful and the other dark and
foreboding. Images are reported to release emotions and thoughts
equal to thousands of words. Emotions are critical to our decision making
process in life. Look again at her photo what else do you see in this
photo? A touch of blood on the edge of the dish?. Marie hiding behind her
instruments, from what, why?
A Nobel prize winning young lady who raised a Nobel prize winning
daughter in the two worlds- two worlds-two
worlds----.!
Today what can any author say these days about Marie Curie's personal or
scientific life that has not been said before and before and before........
Perhaps million and millions of times!
Question------has it been delivered to both worlds on the planet called earth?
secrets coded
 |
Marie
Curies two worlds, what and where are they?
Physical scientists see one earth but---- two
worlds, One they work in, one they live in. Scientist
work world is governed by the rules of nature its population and physical
size is very small, very strict, one is not allowed to live in it without
following exactly the rules of nature. (Like the law of gravity).
Most important and for many practical reasons this world of the scientist
is virtually invisible to the second world the one we all live in.
The second world, vastly larger in physical size and
population the one we all live in, is governed by imagination, wishes and
emotions.
Nature's rules are only second in command.
.
Madam Curie "Marie "
to those who feel close to her) and other scientist work in
the world of nature handling things humans cannot see without
the aid of complex scientific instruments. Instrument to the second world
observers that sometimes look like a train wreck in spaghetti factory.
Atoms, parts of atoms, invisible electromagnetic forces, shorter than x-rays, which
have been just been and still will be discovered.
But she was also working in the second world of emotions,
and a world of competition. However In science it is super
competition. The one who is right is the winner.
The one who is right and first is a super winner. Your work is set permanently
in the halls of human achievements so scientists are always driven
to get their data and conclusion PUBLISHED before
someone else does. Their project may take months, (like Marie's) even years of work
but ---but-- it also has to be done very carefully to be sure it is al
correct enough to be accepted by
competitors, your colleagues., and even possibly by the engineers who
will be
using your work for businesses purposes where they
automatically test your data by using it. In one way or another they will find
all of your
discrepancies. To fail these tests because of falsification you will be
banned from the world of science. Everything you have done, your work,
your education, the work you have planned to do will be held with the
strictness doubt and disgust and it and
you will be avoided. Your former colleagues will resent you and your
actions personally because you will have endangered their work, their
funding with your mistakes your lies.
Scientist are linked together by Natures laws so
aberrations always come to light and abhorred by all because affect all.
Einstein compared the two worlds by remarking at celebration
where he said “One of the strongest
motives that leads men to art and science is escape from everyday life with its
share of painful crudeness and hopeless dreariness. such men make this
cosmos and its construction the pivot of their emotional life in order find the
peace and security they cannot find in a narrow whirlpool of personal
experience."
The famous photograph below was taken some time after two Atomic Bombs were dropped,
killing, burning and broiling untold thousands of humans using Marie's
discovery of nuclear energy and Einstein's e=mc2..
What is this photo below telling the world about you and
science about scientists reputation in the other world ? Is this a secret?
If it is who's secret is it?

So with this attitude can we ever penetrate this invisible world
of science with
its
secrets so as to make it more useful to us in the second world?
Read on!
Back to Marie.
Question? Who are the people
that----------------->
Marie left off of her private secret science list? -Are you one?
----- What secrets?----Where would they be hidden?---Why?
If disclosed would there be a disaster to our business and
religious power centers? Would these secrets
change our way of life? Have these secrets
been camouflage to protected it by using unbreakable codes buried
in the scientific equations, their mathematics, or hidden in
her instruments?
Can we get some clues from the data available to the public. Most data
maybe clouded with errors, some intentionally manipulated for what ever
purpose. Are the secrets in her instruments
The two photos and the circuit drawing below show high level scientists and
engineers meeting with the director/producer of Mystery of Matter all
surrounding Maries Piezo electric driver for her radiation electrometer ( the
tall brass object sitting on a wood tripod table). Everyone is
searching for Marie's secrets in the instrument. The two worlds are
working together to get it right (what ever right means) Was it just the planning
stage of a business venture to sell death ray war machines,
radioactive hot chemicals to poison an enemies water supplies? Think of the plausible
opportunities for these two worlds. More simply it was how did Marie want the
individual components work together to explain it right.


Above Maries circuit and the physical layout for her ionization detector. The
team, shown above, have been on and off for weeks looking for the secrets
in its complex operation. It seemed filled with them. What
are they?

Marie is
very through in her work. Were these "secrets" so
obvious to her that she never intend them to be secrets? Were they are
really just neglects on her part. After all she was not perfect,
even through one of the authors of this website absolutely swears that
she was more than perfect.
Let us look into Marie discoveries to see if its possible to find
more of her secrets, if there are any.?
Her discoveries happened impart because she was at the right
place, the right time, the right colleagues, and with the right
instruments. But she repeatedly demonstrated that she was sharp,
determined, alert, an extraordinary sense of connections, native
abilities, plus the training that one has to have to function
as a successful contributing research scientist to make these discoveries. She
was an intellectually superior student that needed financial
stability .

Marie was an attractive young women with a good figure which can be seen from her photos.
Some
could say she was fetching.
Can we gleam any of Marie's secrets from this photo, From the expression
on Marie's face, her right arm leading Pierre, her fingers clenched,
determined ? Her body straight, shoulders back, head high, yet
suggestive little curls spilling down her forehead. Does she look like
the cat that just swallowed the canary? Does Pierre face look
dazed?
Did she trade on her willingness virtues for a husband who
came complete with a built in technical position, excellent equipment,
connections for a laboratory and the good sense to recognize her
scientific skills even though she was a woman. Did It just seems to
happen natures way. or did it
demonstrate the scientific skills such as showing that she was a
exceptional science planner. which included getting funding for her
scientific work? Was this one of the secrets? Does it say she is
satisfied in gaining the ability to do better and more science or
that she can get a new vacuum cleaner? . Is this another of her secrets in
doing science, in planning?
Did she try to repeat this strategy years after Pierre was tragically
killed in street accident? Instead was his death a conspiracy by a jealous
scientist another of Maries secrets?
Pictures and portraits of Marie seem to help in revealing
valuable information about her, about science, about scientists, about
her secrets?
In the photo to the left for example, notice Marie's expression! Does she
trust you or has she the skepticism needed by scientist in their
professional work? How about these "expressive fingers" . The
ones that carried out all those crystallizations for the isolation of radium.
They also led Marie to the discovery of the massive forces stored in the
nucleus of atoms - a surprising story of chance and opportunity. It
released a technology wonderful on the one hand and fearful on the other when a
few political leaders are left on their own.
These same hands guided her x-ray truck to care for the
wounded solders of WWI.
Did she do this to just earn money for her research? does it make a difference?
Did she learn first hand the struggles of big business protecting their
interest? Read on and see what you come up with to decide. |
 |
Nuclear energy had been hiding from man his whole life.
When Marie was working with her radium samples, her sensitive finger tips felt
very weak heat signals. As part of her purifying processes Marie was
heating her samples to bring more solids into solution which were then poured
into small dishes to cool and crystallize (note this equipment is shown in the
first photo above) But some of her samples never returned to room
temperature There was heat being generated by some unknown but powerful
source because these radioactive samples never cooled as chemicals do after
reaction. Marie pondered "why" and "how"? The answer from the scientist
in Marie Curie was aided by her studies in the awesome laws of
thermodynamics. is one Maries secrets hiding in there? These observation
did spelled out "big time energy". While Marie kept emphasizing the
chemical properties of radium, Pierre and a student measured the physical
properties of these energies. Is this more light on another of Marie's
secrets? team work? individual jealousy? What is Marie's world really like,
What are her secrets?

The physical expression of success on the bright side of her face, yet the
other side is shadowed. Did the photographer see something more? Could this be
a look of dark deep concern for how this enormous energy might be used?
Even at her age Marie was not ignorant about the battles for energy in politics
and war. Perhaps one should go back and look again and think about Marie
and her truck. Perhaps reflect on her scientific ways. Are some of her
secrets hidden here?
Above one of the most important instruments in
the history of science. One of two of Marie's original piezo
electrometers used in her original surveys for materials of radioactivity. The
pan just below the hand held weights to control the spot of light. Marie had to
manipulate the weight to control the spot.
Marie's sensitive fingers were also a vital part of her radiation measuring
devise which required very precise control of the the light spot driven
by the piezo electric instrument in the apparatus shone below.
This almost sacred instrument is
equivalent in importance to Galileo original telescopes.
(Their is a scientist in this photo that did not want to washed the tip
of his finger for some time after touching Marie's piezo electrometers ever so
gently).
What is this spot of light that gives marie a trans hypnotic stare, what is
tugging at it ?
|
.
|
| Authentic Marie
with her magic fingers on the stop watch and intently watching that
little spot of light shown on the scale directly in front of her
trying to keep it right on zero. |
The beautiful replica of Marie staring
at the all important spot of light.. |
Marie motivation for working exceptionally hard as all scientist do
to get their data and its interpretation right. Scientists are the final
judges and juries for each other's work because they use and consequently
test each other's results in their own work. If yours is wrong because of
faulty work they quickly spread the word around about your dangerous
incompetence. I this one of Maries secrets?
A reminder.
Is Einstein, one of Marie's colleagues letting Marie's secret
out of the bag, in a speech he made at fellow
scientist's birthday party where he said-----
|
“One of the strongest motives that
leads men to art and science is escape from everyday life with its
share of painful crudeness and hopeless dreariness. such men make this
cosmos and its construction the pivot of their emotional life in order
find the peace and security they cannot find in a narrow whirlpool of
personal experience." Einstein |
It's very hard work getting into science but easy to be dismissed for
fraud.---- A job in science never was and never will be one without
serious consequence, for all, from bad work. Scientist can lose
their job after enormous work getting it. Is this one of Maries secrets?
.The average person can lose their reputation with white lies and be labeled something but still can get on with
their life and friends. In science no matter what ever your
personal quirks may be your reputation in science is your life. Is this one of
Marie's secrets?
Back to Marie ;her data her observations were right and nuclear energy did
start a vigorous rush to exploit this energy and this has affected the
future of all living things.
That spot of light; ..... Every time it drifted from zero it cause an error
in her measurement. So the quality of her work counted on keeping
it at zero. But what were the demons dragging it off zero. They were
invisible. Some times they would appear over night.
We can see if we stop for a minute and ponder a bit about these simple images
of Marie. She was much more than radium. She was a beacon of science. She
was a beacon of caring behavior.
All of these attributes captured the love and affection of many fledglings of
science. They read books about her, saw movies about her life, her discoveries
and admired and loved her.
One of these fledgling scientists firmly believes that he learned much from
Marie's secrets. One of your co-author of this web site, has carried this
awe all his life and did well by it. Jim and Rhoda not only had the
privilege of making the replicas of her instruments and giving the technical
advise that goes with them for a film,
The Mystery of Matter, but Jim also got a great big hug from
Marie Curie, at least a wonderful replica of her played by the beautiful
actress Juliet Rylance in the up coming film
The Mystery of Matter, a national science foundation
sponsored project.
Science has its twists and turns and some times it's the
little thing that mean so much. a finger, a selection of material etc. etc. It
always seems to cross its path checking its self on the way. Below is a
little relevant example of one such crossing. Can Maries secrets to be learned
by tracking another scientist work experience, instruments techniques? That has
direct bearing on Marie's secrets?
Which helps touch base on another
science that had the seed of spectroscopy in it but not devolved. until the
1860's. Marie was required to use it to validate her discover of radium.
Galileo was more than telescopes. He began a new approach to doing
science - a far better way of getting into the secrets of nature - by making
conclusions based on observations and measurements. He was a part of the
change in our society allowing freer exchange of ideas and solid
investigations of how our all powerful nature works.

Galileo great discovery was not hunting for hidden secrets of
science with his development of the high powered telescope. He was
simply expanding his business of supplying instrument of war to the
military. By chance he was relaxing on his veranda with his new telescope
when he made his stupendous discoveries that change the world from looking at
the nature through a dimensionless philosophic window. To one of
physical measurements and equations. He was one of the pioneers of modern
science. which changed our world of perception opening all we know about
nature now.

|
The magic Genie in a crystal.
Genie is invisible until you see it.
--Quartz--- Galileo used
his telescope to look up into the vast heavens to study the visible radiation
from planets and stars in a universe of enormous proportions. Marie with
her radiation detecting apparatus looked down into the the miniature universe
of elements and atoms to study the mysterious radiation given off by
substances still unknown. Each instrument Galileo's telescope and Marie piezo
electrometer had a common essential component in it.
---Quartz---
Galileo's quartz was in a fused form with a touch of iron in it. They
called it glass. From it he made lenses to focus light (
radiation ).
Marie Quartz was in its
pure crystalline form which was configured into a thin flat slices of
crystal to focus piezo electric fields in her instruments to track
the radiation from radioactivity.
|
 |
The authors have a passion for spectroscopy having
used it for much of their research work. We could not pass up on
the opportunity to borrow two of the replica's we made for the
Galileo museum in Florence Italy.. The beast worked clearly showing
the
Fraunhofer lines in the sun. |
Back to the heat that she felt with
her fingers. It was more than just tell tail evidence of the enormous
energies in the atom. Galileo 200 years earlier was tinkering with
thermometers which was one of the starts Marie needed in her work.
Pierre, Marie's colleague, friend, and husband measured this
energy in one of his calorimeters and published it . This was a notable
contribution because E=MC2 . had not invented yet by
Einstein. Marie and Pierre work must have helped Einstein think
seriously about energy. Marie and Einstein were friends and on the same
team like all scientist are on the same team. You can see her in amongst the
boys she is all but surrounded by the best at the time. Another photo showing
how important her work was to the community See photo at the end of this
website of the 1911-Solvay Conference
She gave this is to the most beautiful---- museum we
thank them for letting us visit and take this picture of it to support
this NSF project
With your patients we end this little tribute and share with you a
short little poem by a friend about Maria. and we will get on with the
apparatus and ----A discussion of the procedures and emotional issues Marie had
to follow in getting her radium.
| MADAME CURIE |
by Larry Keegan |
no lovely lady
should hold this power
in her hand
she felt the very fire
of the universe in her fingertips
a warm tremor that
could not be explained
how the world was structured
we did not know
a lovely lady
should not tell us
of the nucleus
of all things
she had not heard of Hiroshima
or Chernobyl
or a beam that radiates
and cured my cancer
lady scientist
in the chambers of time
you will select for us
those substances
contain this secret
source of fire |
oh Marie
oh Marie
unstable nucleus in your hand
You study the electrostatic
see which
substances contain
the unidentified stream
emissions
tell us lady scientist
in science's murky past
which elements radiate
no lovely lady should hold
this power
please tell us, lady
which elements
as you walk towards us
hands folded cup-like
in an offertory
almost a liturgy
bring us the power
cascading from
the alchemy of stars |
| |
|
Notes and points to fix expand get
across
below is our Marie as she is aging into her final
years still fighting the battle of getting it right. She carries her
scars of hard work and devotion proudly. May we follow the
best of her examples. Did you notice -- Marie's hand and
fingers, that did so much for science, still reaching out beckoning for
the truth as she did with her instruments. This is what the profession
science is really about. "dedication to the truth of your work".
The benefits of basic research are vital to each of us and our
communities. We need more of it and insulated from the basic
power center's mistakes. It could help us more to understand emotionally
not only technically the nature of how sciences gets the
what, how, and why of nature forces rules right. It would help to understand
a little bit how it is controlled by its financial sponsors so that we
can help them through the decision they have to make to protect "our" business.
Photo on left
Maries up turned hand. her fingers that brought us into the nuclear world are
still at work,----Hard work!
The tension of her neck muscles, shoulders and head tipped to stress her point.
Here is a senior scientist, still productive, still, hard at work with her
example still before us. Let us hope Her example of scientists in the world of
science can be made more visible in the very large world of ( imagination and
wishes world (I & W) world.
.
Marie's nuclear energy is not bad it just has to be understood.
Our carbon dioxide is not bad it just has to be understood.
 |
Scientist have dedicated their profession, their jobs, their lives, toward
understanding nature.
One of the most important job that scientist need to understand is how to
help their customers, you, to understand the process of understanding the
correct versus the not correct answers when one can't see nature first
hand through the instruments that scientist see nature
for what it is rather than what one wants it to be.
Through this some what emotional window we offer a
rare opportunity to view and experience in a detailed way replication and
operation of Marie's instruments, instruments that she would have toiled
and fussed over in her studies on radioactivity and her discovery of the power
of the nucleus. In the somewhat chaotic text that follows.
This web site hopes in some small way to presents not just
science and Maries personal life but we hope help the reader see,
learn in an emotional way the true environment that scientist work in.
The the enormance pressure of their fellow scientist put on each other to do a
proper job, to get the work right.....If we can give the reader a true
gut feeling of this type of understanding of the dogged determination and some
of the smartness needed by scientists to get their data, their conclusions and
products as right as possible with the resources afforded them we hope it help
the individual get more from the scientific community than one does today.
As with Marie, the drive is mostly a determined curiosity, but it yields in
some unplanned ways, how science returns on your investment for a better chance
at a better life for all of us.
This site has been created for your consideration by
Jim & Rhoda Morris
K1ugm@comcast.net 781 245
2897
http://www.scitechantiques.com/
Her
instruments, have
a look at them and the authors replicating them.
Her
Operating
the detector
Her chemistry, see the
tedious crystallization experiments she ran to isolate and purify radium salts
Her professional life, typically dull dull
repetitive kind of work,
The
murky world of funding
your basic research
work

Marie & Pierre Curie and
Rhoda & Jim Morris Scientists themselves.
How close can one get in checking out other scientists project?

Our almost science fiction story but with
real jump in time and space. of about 100 years. The
most unusual difference between the photo above and below. is not so
much that there are two different science teams, and two
husband and wife science teams, but a more very real common
denominator, that is, one is reproducing as exactly as reasonably
possible the work, the instruments, of the other, both
in the cause of science.

Point one; Take a look at just one of the most nerve
racking, boring things Marie had to do during her daily enrichment
ritual to get her radium. of staring intently at the little
ball of light on the glass scale in front of her struggling to keep
it at zero. by shifting a weight on a pan under
her piezo device. It ranged from a few seconds to minutes.
This time was a measure of the degree of radioactivity of her
sample. That time that went by was super important to her. It told
her how successful her purification of radium was going . The
shorter the better the purification was.
Few of us have to be
reminded how much the products of science have affected the daily, and
extraordinary times in our lives. They're obvious and naturally taken for
granted.
What's not obvious: is
it safe in basic research science's progress to take for grant
length of time to do it ?? Many of our basic personal problems still need
basic scientific research if they are to be solved. Lower: health
care costs, educational costs, better employment
opportunities, population growth , global climate threats, add yours
to the list. Science through basic research, as in the past (as Marie
Curie did) will be the active partner in the solutions' that give each of
us a better quality of life. The time to get solutions is strongly
dependant on the other team users. How can we tell how our team is
doing.
But to deal with all of this we need to know more about how the work
of science is done; what their work life is really like; the factors that
dictate the reliability of their work; and we don't really have to study
scientific topics like the scientists do. With this knowledge we can go
about our own business but make sure that the scientists are working on
our problem
Translating scientific work from the tech world to the non
tech world has few alternative than using the
murky world of Eight Parts of Speech especially in the
dangerous villages of adjectives and adverbs. Scientist improved progress
by jumping pass this murky communication world of language and
created one of numbers and mathematical equation of time length and
mass operation and symbols where ther is better nt perfect means of
spelling out the laws of nature.
How about learning how
discoveries are made, understood and proved and how . Learning these
things are more important and require less work and time than you are
spending now sweating science and math tests. Ask your school to
teach you what you need to make sure scientists are working on your
projects.
Goal: at the mention
of the word science there will be an enormous rush of dopamine
dumped into your system.
Goal: at the mention
of the eight parts speech there will be enormous rush of adrenalin into
your system.
But
First !
A
little known discovery of big proportions
Marie Curie was not just a star in the discovery department
She was a super star. Her early work was before the famous equation
"E=MC^2"
was generated and before the scientist had a clear view of the atom.
Here is a bit of the inside story; of what the authors believe was Her greatest
discovery.
Her hard work, Her keen scientific perceptiveness. Her shear persistence,
being at the right place right time. Marie was the first to discover the
enormous amount of energy contained in the atom. She found this during
her researches in radioactivity. Marie made this discovery using her finger
tips plus guidance from her radiation detector, but most important her
determination, skill for scientific deduction from observables. These authors
ever wonder why most writers - hailing Marie - flip past this
discovery at best hinting at it? Just radium, radium and more radium? At this
point in time with hind site in science there was nothing more important, more
dramatic, more spectacular than this discovery of atomic energy
generating the biggest scientific explosion ever in human history.
A lack of drama? A lack of public interest? We don't know. Do you?
One of Marie's co-scientist did remark (summed up in one of these authors
words),
Leave it to some damn woman to discover and advertise the knowledge of such
enormous power.
Rutherford?
|

Marie knew the scientific importance
of what she had discovered - but - being a generous person
gave away her financial rights to the public of refining the ore to get
radium.. |

Marie knew first hand about war. She volunteered, during ww1, her
service to France and drove an x-ray equipped truck to help care for the
wounded. Marie was there servicing first hand the wounded. |


It is not what scientists discover it's who and what
others use it for. |
This point of view is important enough to run through it
again. Her discoveries of
Polonium and Radium
paled by comparison. to her most important discovery-- the enormous power
within the atom. Her simple observation was that her radium enriched
samples were warmer to the touch
than the ones with less or no radium and she recognized that the
source of this heat was many, many times that which could be generated by
any chemical reaction. So before she was finished with her work with
radium, Marie had ushered us into the very wonderful and dangerous
world of nuclear energy . Not only was there the alpha, beta, and gamma
rays given off by radium and its family there was -a seemly-
unlimited thermal energy being generated according to Einstein's
famous yet to be discovered equation .---> E=MC^2 <- was
hinted at experimentally by Marie before Einstein invented his
formula.
.
This web site is special ; by giving intimate pictures
of the interior as well as the exterior of Marie's equipment,
her chemistry, her resolve. We show the details of our process of
replication of Maries equipment and experiment for a NSF
documentary.
Accented is Marie's
radiation detector which is a story in itself which demonstrates
how many science discoveries really come about- \\ That is through a
of chain of scientific instruments each born after
weeks, years and centuries of earlier scientific investigations, blended
together into Marie's and Pierre's sophisticate famous
detector. coupled with the chemically stained fingers of a young,
beautiful, serious minded woman, led to an unheralded yet
deeply shocking discovery of nuclear energy and incidentally
the atom bomb.
Look and listen carefully to Marie experiences! Try
it if you haven't. One might get lucky and almost feel and
experience of what it is like to be a typical yet lucky
scientist.
-Concentrate hard enough to feel Marie sending us these very
important emotional messages, feelings about how science and
scientist work. To some Marie's message maybe in
clear view but also invisible because it may be so obvious.
Obvious? But obvious is not always obvious. Had Marie ignored the
sleight difference in warmth on her chemically stained, trained,
fingers touching her samples someone else would have discovered the
immense power in the atom. Science gropes along piece by piece
waiting for the accidental scientist to come along and discover
almost by accident something great and wonderful.
Stop----Look at your fingers
.
They're not just fingers they are scientific instruments. fingers
can count, measure mass, radiant heat, texture, read
information in brail, measure length, sense time, via
rhythm, acceleration, on and on. connect this to a sense of logic
and inquiry, speaks for itself to everyone but especially to
the trained scientist. This plus tenacity leads to scientific
discoveries. Marie discovery demonstrates this process.
Yes Marie is a popular scientist but for
many reasons - some obvious - some not scientific. Marie's fame
carries with it messages of considerable value some hidden
by the drama of romance of a young couple in love each sharing
their love of the sciences only to be separated by a tragic accident to
Pierre. by the drama, of Maries as a "'female" scientist, a rounded
scientist founding intuitions, doing war work for her adopted country and
last not least her scientific work. Marie is even
more extraordinary today from her example. She still works busily in
science for science. She is still a handsome intense ageless
creature which seldom if ever smiles
. Haven't you noticed and she has not changed much ?
Marie has not been as successful in her present role, as an example,
as she was with her radium. But them again like her discovery of the
energy stored in the atom is not being heralded enough.
Her extraordinary message to the non-science public seems to be
coming across like a lead balloon. Lead being near the final
element in the uranium radium decay chain.
The single most important messages.
She was not only a beacon of science. She was a beacon of caring
behavior.
Marie whispering to the non-science world although that is
right in front of our faces but like her fingers we do not see them or
hear it. Her message maybe too close, to obvious, not interesting,
exciting, nor a money maker enough to spend much time on it.
For those trying to help Marie get her message across they must
sense the lack of emotional appeal of the message much like Marie
might have felt when she was confronted with a couple of tons of rock
and dirt called pitchblende dumped into the yard of her shed. It was
not clear that Marie sensed that this ton of dirt only had
a tiny almost a speck
of radium in it but as time pressed on Marie pressed on
spending years to get at it.
Step one in getting at Marie's secret message. " To
be contributing a scientist one need to be close to insane
with persistence not just brilliance " and this is generally true for most
all science projects.
Another part of the - hidden not so hidden -message is the ho hum-ness of
a typical experimental scientist day. To truly understand the scientist
environment the observer needs to get inside the scientist's
brain. But than what?. This invisible world of science is walled in
by language barriers of infinite height and length hiding the real
reason scientist seldom corrupt their data. if your not one of them If one
has not experienced being a scientist how can one feel the ethical
force that is as strong in a relative sense as the hidden
forces in the atom Neither of which are visible to the non
science world.
Because we do not hear enough of Marie's message we lose
much of the truly civilized value of our scientific discoveries and its
because of the wall. Would it not be wonderful if we could climb over the
wall and reclaim what is rightly ours. Another part of Marie's
secret message "understanding the enormous emotional force stressing
scientist into getting it right".
This is only part of the hidden message. Obvious, not Obvious! So
onward Marie keep telling more of your story A story that
helps us understand the science we don't understand that we need to
understand emotiomaly.
The authors will try in a very small way to help you experience what
being an experimental scientist for a day is like. maybe when your
are inside of the wall you will sense the ethical force for your self.
At least you will see behind the scenes detail of scientist and film
makers working together
to give you a best view of dealing with a scientific topic.
Last but not least in the near future we will be furnishing
the reader with a little poetry; touching, surrealistic, quaint,
tender maybe foolish love story about Marie never disclosed
before.
781 245 2897 Jim
& Rhoda Morris
K1ugm@comcast.net
Main web site
SciTechAntiques.com
We need our teachers of science help us better understand the
diabolical aspects of Nature which is often reversed to our common
sense understandings Examples Galileo 's lenses,.
teaching how our scientist get it rSight more than the
obtuse complexities of math and principles of science
The Mystery of Matter
and a little spot of light
by Jim & Rhoda Morris
A national science foundation sponsored project.
|

figure1
Stephen E. Lyons
Project Director
The Mystery of Matter:
Search for the Elements and Rhoda Morris one of the technical advisers on
this project. working out some of the details of the replication of the
apparatus Marie used to measure the radiation levels in her discovery of
radium.
A national science foundation sponsored project. |
|
In the beginning God said Let there be light----Marie Curie took
God up on this gift and dedicated her life to watching just a
little spot of light.
______________________________________________________________________
This web page cast a stronger light on Marie , than the
spot from her instrument , hopefully showing how hard she and
fellow scientist work to get their research results right. Readers
can experience much of the tedium, frustration,
elation, personal relation ship with their instruments and
the highbrow discrimination in Scientific discovery that most scientist
especially Marie experienced.

Figure 2
1/23/2013
Would you believe some people think that the typical work day for a
scientist boarders on the "thrilling, exciting, and dramatic? Read on and
think twice
TRY
VERY VERY HARD to imagine yourself as a scientist (maybe Marie Curie)
sitting in front of this dismal little spot of light for hours of tedious
experimenting. ------ Your goal is to measure the radioactivity of a
substances with a super delicate set of instruments making up the
apparatus. One of the steps is to keep that nervous little light
spot from moving off zero, "0" on the meter scale. With one hand in
an awkward position you slowly lift a weight that controls the position
of the spot of light while the thumb of your other hand is poised to
click the top button of a stop watch to record the exact second you lose
control of that damn little spot. Next you log the time, the date,
the sample description, etc., in your journal. You repeat this
process again and again, sample after sample, day after day, month after
month, year after year.
Marie
spent some 3 years making these measurements. Between these
sessions she stirred pots of dangerous chemicals, filtered solutions,
performed fractional crystallizations, purifying and purifying again and
again, repeating the same processes thousands of times. Imagine yourself
working nearly 24/7, fussing with mysterious radiation burns on
your body, working in a leaky shed which was either too cold or too hot.
You, Marie Curie, at times worked for no salary while you stared at
this little roaming circle of light over and over again to measure the
level of radioactivity for thousands of samples.
Last
but not least you (Marie) never really knew whether any of this work
would turn out to be of any value and whether it would result in you
getting your degree.
Even
today in many ways this word picture is not far off from a scientist’s
typical experience. To be sure many scientists work in air
conditioned offices instead of a shed but the grilling tedium is still
there in copious amounts.
But
luck, hard work and diligence paid off for Marie. All these
sacrifices did accumulate into one of the most dramatic
changes in our culture, our future. To this day the discovery of radium
was one of the first steps toward releasing the immense
power contained in the atom; it surely was one of the major
stepping stones in getting to where we are at today.
So for
those of us who were lead to believe that science was mostly Thrilling,
Exciting, and Dramatic? hmmmmmmmmmmmmm? Yes, it can have its
moments, but!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A hidden secret did you find it? Try again with more hints. Review what
it took Marie to carryout a successful research project?.
Could understanding this comparatively small obvious point
of repetitive dry hard work and high risk endeavor somehow help us
to judge the worthiness of scientific work without knowing the
science? With this critical use in mind lets summarize our short moment
of being Marie's at her super sensitive radium radiation
detector -->.
go back to her unequaled discovery...
Marie in this tedious work discovered that her radium samples
were always warmer
than the surroundings would ordinarily let it be. Day after day year
after year there was heat being generated by her radium. There was
no chemical reaction that could sustain this continued
release of heat--(energy)--which continued for years on end. Marie
was the first to find and recognized this enormous amount of energy
stored in the atom. In the years to come her radium was also
used to measure the size of the nucleus, to do the first nuclear
transmutation. All of this ultimately leading us to
the nuclear world; reactions in atomic bombs, nuclear power plants,
nuclear
medicine, etc..
Lets see if we agree what is
the not so hidden secret message in this description of a scientist
at work.
Trusting scientist work?
and how to discredit it.
Very very few scientist lie or misrepresent their work after
having put so much effort to get funding and tedious hard work to do the
science right. If a scientist did misrepresent their work they
would soon be caught in the system of automatic checking that has to be
done as the next scientist finds that using the guilty
scientist data in their work does not work. The guilty one
will be quickly flagged and publicly discredited, The
guilty one will likely lose their funding and certainly their
creditability . An occasion scientist my do something unethical. It
can happen as in other professions but by comparison seldom in science
and when found is a good test of the scientific system of auto checking
for accuracy. This self regulation of the scientific profession
should be taught and inspired again and again hopefully as
enhanced permanent component of the science curriculum. The advertisement
of knowledge of this auto regulation phenomena is valuable
and could help to protect the public from
the misuse of their science for uncivilized purposes using the
scientist creditability arguments as a tool for generating a
mistrust of a specific scientific project.
Marie was truly both the mother and father planting and
growing the seed that
many
scientist
also took and grew into an enormous promise for a better
life or maybe no life.
Sooooo on with the
story of replicating and using Marie and Pierre laboratory
equipment............
--Thrilling, exciting, and dramatic??? hmmmmmmmmmmmmm? This is
challenge for the Director and crew of
The Mystery of Matter.
A national science foundation sponsored
project.
|
|
. 
Figures 3 & 4 |
| Marie and Pierre were not
available for the shooting due to previous engagements. Replicas
of Marie and Pierre Curie were substituted by very fine actors
Marie Curie: Juliet Rylance and Pierre Curie: Sebastian Roche
Jim & Rhoda have replicated Marie and Pierre's
experiment as accurately as possible . We are of the
perception that Science is too valuable too everyone to be
needlessly misrepresented
(Click here ref(
1). The team working on this project understands this and
have used working instruments and experimental techniques
that Marie would have used. When the originals
instrument were not available we made accurate replicas of
them. If the chemicals used were unsafe to handle on the set we
substituted safer chemicals but similar reactions etc.. The
following part of this web site outlines our efforts
toward this end.
|
A remarkable coincidence below two
husband and wife scientist teams meet with a time shift of a little over a
century. But both are interested in Radium but for different reasons.
Marie & Pierre Curie and
Rhoda & Jim Morris Their is a qute little story beginning to
come to light here.

We took the liberty of adding the little white light to the scale she is looking
at. figure 5
|
 |
 |
|
Marie and Pierre in their
lab
figure 6 |
Rhoda and Jim in a part of our lab
showing the complete replication of Marie radioactive radiation
detecting setup on the table. Note the wash bottle in Rhoda's hand.
The photo on the left. shows Marie holding her wash bottle in of her
classic wash bottle pose. Figure 7 |
---------------------------
The replication of the amount
radium Marie extracted from her tons of pitchblende.
This tiny amount was the product of years of toil, frustration, and
elation. Followed by her premature death from radiation poisoning.

The amount of radium chloride that Marie extracted from
more than a ton of pitchblende over a period of some 3 years of work.
figure 8 |
 |
| |
Figure 9 |
Photo's below',
Replication of the crystal separation
process used by Marie in her isolation of radium from pitchblende. The photo on
the right is of the same sample as on the left but under radiation of a
ultra-violet lamp. Note how there are crystals that came out first' they are on
outer rim. Its important to note that the separation is never entirely complete
so the mixture has to be separated from the rest and re-crystallized
again and again and again.--------Poor Marie.



figure 10
-----------------------------
Rhoda on the film set of
The Mystery of Matter
replication some of the chemical separation processes
used by Marie separating radium from of pitchblende
|

Rhoda replicating one of the chemical extraction process
Marie Curie used in her work for the separation of radioactive
elements out of pitchblende. Figure 11
|
.

Whipping up some glowing samples to spread around the laboratory to
represent the illusion of the radium fluorescing in the crystallizing
dishes spread among the lab tables.Figure 12 |
|

Rhoda demonstrating before the directors possible chemical
set ups for the film. This is a scene not often pictured for the
viewers. Everyone here is working hard to get the film right but often
from very different perspectives. and a different "right". It is hard work
but worth it. ("we're trying Marie. Rhoda is doing
her best")
Figure 12a |
The Curies very famous radiation detector.
|
Below a photo of Jim & Rhoda's
replication of the Curies very famous radiation detector. It's a tabletop full
of high tech parts from a number of different branches of scientific research.
It is a story within a story of how science works in a day by day basis.
but there is no time to tell the instrument saga here and now. So onward.
This is the only picture showing the whole kit and computable that we know of so
feast your eyes on this wonderful machine. Click the picture to get a bigger one
to see all the detail. |
|
Below we describe it piece
by piece
.
Figure 14 this is the equipment on stage
ready for shooting the scenes for
Mystery of Matter.
lick on the photo to get a better view- It's worth it. |
Radioactive
radiation detectors used by
Marie Curie.
The amount of effort and time making one, and learning to operating one
is substantial.
The discussion and detail in the discussion below
hopefully gives the reader a view of how hard we all try to get it
right as is possible.
First a bit of history. Radioactivity was first discovered during 1896 by the
French
scientist
Henri Becquerel The first radiation detector was a piece of
photographic film which grew darker with exposure to radioactive materials
even though the film was in a light tight container. Soon after, It was
discovered that a radioactive substance would ionize air around it allowing the
air to conduct electricity. The greater the radioactivity the better the air
conducted electricity. Experimenters turned this feature into a measuring
tool to rank the strength of radioactivity in various samples.
Pierre Curie
had been using a super sensitive instrument an electrometer figures
19,20,21 for measuring voltages using very small number of electrons, He had
been using such a device and a piezoelectric voltage device in some
earlier work and recommended it to Marie so that she might use a
modification of it in her studies of radioactivity in minerals
etc..
Marie's instrument
was essentially a condenser used as an ionization chamber,
see figure below,
(insulator));,Definition of a condenser (two electrical conductors separated by
a dielectric.
Marie's condenser consists of two metal
disks separated by a layer of air . By adding electrons, Figure 19 to one plate
of this condenser Fig. 20. it would developed a voltage difference across
the two plates.
Putting a sample between the plates Exposing
the air between the two plates to the radiation from a radioactive substance
would caused electrons flow from one plate to the other plate.
equalizing the portion of electrons between the plates thus dropping the voltage
drop across them to zero.
The time for this to happen would be a function of the magnitude of
the radioactivity of the sample
So Marie's. in its simplest form radiation
detector
turned out to be;
a condenser( a very special condenser), a source (a very special source)
of electrons, a voltmeter ( a very special voltmeter figures 19,20,21 the one
with the little moving spot of light) and a stop watch to measure the time
of equalizing the electrons from one plate to the other.
______________________________________________________
A more detailed description of Marie Curie’s Method for making the
measurement the Radioactivity from Radium Samples
put together for the director producer of the Mystery of Matter
showing the detail technical information considered to make the film as
exact as possible. See circuit diagrams below the following discussion.
(1/18/13,
J & R M)
Overview
The process used by Marie Curie to measure the
radioactivity of the radium samples she extracted from pitch blend can
be explained as follows:
- It used the effect that radioactivity has on
the conductivity of air in a sample chamber. .
- The sample chamber consisted of two plates
separated by air called a condenser. The voltage across the plates
was supplied by a voltage supplied by a piezo device.
- Because air is not conductive, no current
flows from one plate to the other when the sample chamber is empty.
- When radium is placed on one of the chamber
plates its radioactivity makes the air between the plates conductive
and a current will flow. When the electrical connection is
broken by a switch, the charge across the condenser will discharge
and the speed at which the voltage across the two plates changes
will be a measure of the radioactivity. So measuring the
charge leakage and associated time is key.
- A fast change indicates high radioactivity and
a slow change is due to low radioactivity.
Challenge of measuring small changes
The current changes Marie was measuring were ultra
small, in the range of one thousandths of a billionth of an ampere, and
very challenging to measure.
- She used a state of the art, very sensitive
apparatus consisting of a quadrant electrometer in conjunction with
a newly developed electrostatic charge generator (also called a
piezoelectric instrument) developed earlier by Pierre Curie and his
brother Jacques Curie for measuring very small current changes in
insulators.
- This novel piezoelectric instrument could
produce ultra small calibrated positive and negative charges by
increasing or decreasing weights suspended from a specially
configured quartz crystal.
Electrical circuit and measurement process
The sample chamber, the electrometer and the
piezoelectric unit were connected as shown in the circuit diagram,
figure 5 in reference1 in the cover letter.
- As mentioned above, with a radium sample in
the condenser sample holder, a battery supplying voltage across it
and the circuit switch closed, a small current flows through the
condenser due to the conductivity of the air induced by the
radioactivity of the sample.
- The charge across the condenser plates is
measured by the light spot on the quadrant electrometer scale.
- By opening the circuit switch, the current
through the circuit will stop and the electrometer reading will
change as the charge across the plates depletes.
- This depletion rate is dependent on the level
of conductivity produced by the radioactive sample, a low rate very
difficult to measure precisely.
The piezoelectric instrument to the rescue
With the piezoelectric instrument in the circuit
Marie was able to measure the charge depletion rate of the sample
condenser by supplying an equivalent charge in a measurable time to
compensate for the loss.
- When the circuit switch is opened and
the electrometer light spot wants to change. She makes sure the
electrometer is set at zero and the stop watch is clicked on..
In a controlled manner, She carefully, adjusts the weight on
the piezoelectric device continually compensating for the condenser
charge loss by keeping the electrometer spot at its original, zero
position.
- This is required practice since any deviation
of the electrometer light spot from the original zero introduced
errors.
- With a stop watch running she
simultaneously measured the in hand from when the
electrometer spot at zero first tried to move to when it no
longer was controllable by removing weight.
- The time measures when the same amount of
electricity has passed through the condenser plates as was released
by the piezoelectric quartz instrument. (This gives coulombs per
unit time.)
- Finally using the equations relating the
charges, times, currents and sample weights, she determined the
radioactivity values for the radium samples tested by this method.
_______________________________________________________________
Below is a fair amount of detail in replicating the equipment
that Marie Curie used in her early radium work for measuring the level of
the radioactivity from samples of a wide variety of mineral etc..
The bottom line
There are four major components making up the radiation detector; a very
precise piezoelectric source of electric charge to be placed across the plates
of the ionization chamber, a quadrant electrometer measuring the
status of this charge, a stop watch, not shown, for measuring the
discharge time of the piezoelectric crystal. |
| As mentioned above the instrument called the
piezoelectric electrometer, which they used to the
measure the level of radioactiveness from various sources was simple in
concept and management of its operation turned out to be a challenge to
understand and describe for the viewer.
Below are two
photo showing an engagement of some of the experts debating how to carry
out this task. They are surrounding an exact replica of the Curie
instrument the authors of this website made used in thee the film while
discussing the instrument, its operation and how to describe
it and its operation for the viewers of the film. The fuel for the
first session of the this high tech get together was cheese, crackers
beer. later we retired to the a candle light dinning room
filled with cabinets of rare scientific instruments followed by
piesa wine desert coffee and tea. |
Below is a set of three circuit diagrams of Curie's
radiation measuring apparatus.
the first comes from a paper?????
..
figure13a Includes a sketch including the electrostatic
shielding, and optical configurations
This figure 13b below shows a medium simplified circuit. by getting
getting rid of the shielding and protection devices. It's still somewhat messy.

The figure13c below shows only the essential components for basic
understanding the operation of the detector.

|
The confusion comes about in the role
of the battery during the operation plus where the spot of
light should be held on the scale at the start and during the time
measurement.
After much discussion the final conclusion
was that the role of the battery is to give a starting bias voltage to the
ionization chamber, not to furnish the electricity during the time
measurement. The pieso devise is the sole supplier of the electricity
needed to keep the voltage constant across the ionization chamber during
the measurement.
Any electricity coming from or to the
battery during the measurement causes an error in the measurement.
This error happens when the spot is allowed to go off zero.
The question of where to keep the spot of light is verified by
Marie in an excerpt from one of her papers. Below
is a copy of Marie Curie's view of synchronizing the
motion of the light spot and stop watch to get most accurate readings for
the level of radioactivity from a sample in the chamber. Here she shows a
simplified version of the circuit similar to ours shown in figure13c and
specifically states "it is better to balance the charge of the electrometer in a
way to keep it at the zero reading" . |

13-b and 13-c Marie's piezo electrometer. In one of her publications
listed above she has included an even simpler diagram
and explanation of her preferred operation including
maintaining the electrometer at zero during the test.
The photos below are showing the raw construction details we made
of the piezoelectric driver for the radiation measurement.
|

Making The components for the metal frame of the
special piezoelectric voltage generator
It was designed by Pierre and his brother Marie used it for
measuring the level of radioactivity of her samples. The parts are
just about ready to be silver soldered. Figure 15 |

Cutting slots in the under top of the wooden tripod
stand for the legs that hold the Piezoelectric power supply.Figure
16 |
|

Assembling the metal and the wooden components for the
piezoelectric generator Figure 17
|

Its getting closer.
Adding the pan for carrying the weights which create a voltage from
the strain they put on the quartz crystal. thus applying a
charge across the ionization chamber. Figure 18 |
|

Our completed replica of the infamous piezoelectric
coulomb generator used in Marie's radiation measuring
instrument. Figure 19 |

The ionization chamber. Samples are placed between the
horizontal circular plates and then covered to electrically shield them
from stray electric voltages that would otherwise corrupt the measurements
of radioactivity. Figure 20
|
--------------------------------
The Quadrant electrometer
|
.

figure 21 |
The Quadrant electrometer is a very
special voltmeter developed by Lord Kelvin used by Marie this
is the most sensitive and accurate of all the mechanical electrometers.
The original uses a light aluminum sector suspended inside a drum cut
into four segments. The segments are insulated and connected diagonally
in pairs. The charged aluminum sector is attracted to one pair of
segments and repelled from the other. The deflection is observed by a
beam of light reflected from a small mirror attached to the sector,
In this part of the replication we remotely
controlled by radio the location of light and its motion on
the scale in front of Marie. This simulated the movement of
the spot of light for the actor as if there was an actual sample of
radioactive material in the ionization chamber. We chose to do this
for the safety of the filming crew and actors thus illuminating the
need of radioactive samples on the set. |
|
 |
 |
The innards of the quadrant
electrometer. The "d" sections have been opened to show the viewer
the light aluminum vane of the unit just before mounting the
1 meter f. l. mirror on the servo shaft. Figure 22
|
Installing the radio control servo for
manipulating the light spot on the screen in front of Marie
Figure 23 |
|
Spectroscopy played such very important
role as a scientific tool that
a spectrum of a proposed element was required by those keeping track of
what was and what was not an element had to be taken before this committee
would validate its existence.
The Apparatus we replicated for these
scenes of Marie's chemical spectroscopy of Radium are below.
|

The completer spectroscopic setup; power supply, spectral
light source,
over and under slit spectroscope, samples, book case filled with reference
data Figure 24 |

Spectroscope, chemicals, double spectral spark source
to record radium spectra.Figure 25 |
|

Close up view of the dual spectral light source and the
split entrance slit of the spectroscope Figure 26 |

Figure 27 The spectra of each atom ion or molecule is very distinct from
one another. These bar codes of rainbows cover a range of
frequencies from smaller than little and larger than big---they can only
be expressed via quantum theory. Everything we know about our
universe basically come from spectroscopy and here is Marie's atomic
spectrum of radium in all its beauty. |
Here is Marie
The founding members experimentalist , theoretician of the nuclear
scientist club. Each a competitor and colleague.
Marie bottom row 2nd from the right surrounded with the giants of
physics that set fire to our culture in the most critical yet obtuse way.
1911-Solvay Conference on the theory of radiation and quanta:”
English: Photograph of
participants of the first Solvay Conference, in 1911, Brussels, Belgium.
Seated (L-R):
Walther Nernst,
Marcel Brillouin,
Ernest Solvay,
Hendrik Lorentz,
Emil Warburg,
Jean Baptiste Perrin,
Wilhelm Wien,
Marie Curie, and
Henri Poincaré. Standing (L-R):
Robert Goldschmidt,
Max Planck,
Heinrich Rubens,
Arnold Sommerfeld,
Frederick Lindemann,
Maurice de Broglie,
Martin Knudsen,
Friedrich Hasenöhrl,
Georges Hostelet,
Edouard Herzen,
James Hopwood Jeans,
Ernest Rutherford,
Heike Kamerlingh Onnes,
Albert Einstein, and
Paul Langevin.
|
.Marie looks very down
why?
|

Figure28
Question Did Madam Curie shown above (in one of her more reflective
moments) act as a scientist
pushing back the frontiers of science or act as an engineer
working on what would be called an Atomic Bomb?
The nominal spherical mass is crudely the size
of the
critical mass for an 235U
nuclear weapon . It.should be 56 kg,[3]
a sphere 17.32 cm (6.8") in diameter? |
Einstein in the famous photo below shows great
frustration with who ever he is looking at. Why? What is he trying to tell us
with all of his soul?
In the beginning of his career he was young handsome man, note him
standing behind Marie in the photo above. A young
scientist at the height of his important discoveries. He certainly looks older
in picture below. To some much older than his age. To many it's fun to poke fun
at a scientist. But here he is not poking fun at the viewer. |

What do you think this gentleman's opinion
of us is?
Question looking at the selected photos of these these two world
famous scientist could they be disappointed with what we have done with their
contribution thus far?
Really! Could
they?
|
Some observe that it is the
little things about science that can become the most important part of science
especially in the formation of the nonscientist public opinion
of some piece of scientific work. This is especially true when scientist are
evaluating the results of some far reaching scientific project which maybe
crucially complex and crucially important to our culture.
How is one to judge the trueness of their opinions.
1st and foremost what are the sources of information used forming the
opinion?
Why ask the question
For example, The solution to
this dilemma or misunderstanding can be a simple piece of information that
plays a big part in our point of judgment of the truthfulness of a
scientific result . If the non scientific publics overall opinion is not
sound and they don't accurately digest some piece of
scientific work it might result in a spectacularly noisy and warm world
like 1,000,000 of these
going off spread over a ?0 years. Using this energy in a controlled
way to replace carbon as our primary source of energy might be better than
using it as a non political solutions to that someone's needs.
How are we to judge the trueness of a piece of scientific work, work that
is extremely complex and complex to understand. Work that would
concern everyone every thing. Of course more often than not we use the
fundamental method of trust of the people or organization used as your
primary source.
How is one to judge the trueness of an opinion What are the sources of
information used forming the opinion? Why ask the question
How is one to judge the trueness of an opinion What are the sources of
information used forming the opinion? Why ask the question
One of the little but important
things in judging the trueness of a piece of scientific work, work that is
extremely complex to understand. is sort of diagnostic tool we
use in other circumstances of our daily life. the question can we
emotionally trust the source of the info and why the person or
organization's. So it is important to know what is the working environment
of the source not so much the person or organization.
a typical
scientist and the fellow scientist working on the same project, What
kind of rules and environment do scientist live in and by? the
incidental day by day monotony of the work. It seems trivial doesn't
it. Remember Marie in her work. Think of it, only a few
humans out of the multitude of all the bright people in the world can
take and live with the monotony being a scientist. It is not
just being resourceful and creative that makes a scientist, it is
having the determination, the willingness in spite of the boredom and
frustration to get your project right.
The average day in a scientist project is so boring to the average person
that the story tellers; the historians, ,The media can only hold our
interest by working really hard at building the few short
moments of glorious feeling to a super height to keep the viewers //
readers attention. Of course this process tends to distort the view
of how scientist work so much so that to the average person pauses,
wonders whether the scientist had the patients or common sense to get
it right. Few of the nonscientific public emotionally feel that
the results of a project is just plain hard ass work. The
tedious work of getting repeatability of the measured data and
getting the same answer by other ways as well. Of course in time the
scientist answer will be measured more accurately by the next
generation. on and on Just like light Marie's little spot of light has been
made brighter and righter with time.
The authors wonder if we would be worth
concentrating little more on checking our sources of info that we use
to form our opinions. Especially when some of the work is so important to
our civilization. that instead of living in a confusion and
profusion by technical knowledge to get to gain a scientific trueness
instead could it be better to develop an emotional awareness of how
hard it is to survive as scientific scientist and to have your work
accepted by your colleagues. In their world scientist depend enormously on
the other scientist work to do theirs . if the other guy is wrong than all
of your hard won work goes down the drain. could this fact be
strong enough to validate their results most of the time for the average
folk that have more important things to do than take science courses,
courses that might lower your grade average which might prevent you
from taking further degrees and or getting a better job. There has to be a
better way?
To be expamnded----------------------------------------------------------------------------
it must come about. It is also to know
who are the judges the lawyers the judges and policemen that protect us
from the evil ways a wayward a scientist or groups of scientist. for
a lot of practical reason we can not be in the lab/office to study their
behaviors their environments they operate to judge.
We can give you a
view of working replicas of her equipment most were tested and
found to be working order in our laboratories. We give descriptions
for replica on some occasions the operation might be run
limited manner of operation to a safe mod so as not endanger the people on
the set.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |
|
| MADAME CURIE |
by Larry Keegan |
no lovely lady
should hold this power
in her hand
she felt the very fire
of the universe in her fingertips
a warm tremor that
could not be explained
how the world was structured
we did not know
a lovely lady
should not tell us
of the nucleus
of all things
she had not heard of Hiroshima
or Chernobyl
or a beam that radiates
and cured my cancer
lady scientist
in the chambers of time
you will select for us
those substances
contain this secret
source of fire |
oh Marie
oh Marie
unstable nucleus in your hand
You study the electrostatic
see which
substances contain
the unidentified stream
emissions
tell us lady scientist
in science's merky past
which elements radiate
no lovely lady should hold
this power
please tell us, lady
which elements
as you walk towards us
hands folded cup-like
in an offertory
almost a liturgy
bring us the power
cascading from
the alchemy of stars
|
|
|
WORK IN PROGRESSThis has to be one
of the most well known photos of a scientist who was all ready well
known. with hunders maybe thousands of photos take of him and avaiable to
the public before this likeness showed up so what is he saying
after livimng so many years having done so much through
science tha effected each and everyone of us. what is this last message
that is reaching out to each and everyone that can all cultures
both sexes all ages..seen whT IAS HUIS LAST WORD TO US
Question what is he telling the viewer . As I 've studied it over and
over again. Their is one messaage he maybe be convaying to the viewer is
that he is telling the view in body language what he thinks of you
personally Dr.Einstie
|
On the side The authors of this web page
http://www.scitechantiques.com/
in real life The Curies had their bicycles we have our antique off shore
cursing sloop
|
 |
 |
|
Jim & Rhoda doing the bottom paint on their sailboat. |
Rhoda the skipper of Josh with a rain storm in the
offing. |
Yes you control it with your left hand but ever so slightly. The
least twitch and the spot light will zip off your chosen location.
The dot of light is being controlled by you co-supporting a weight
anywhere from 50 to 500 grams which is sitting on a tray that is
hanging from a piezoelectric crystal. this weight is distorting a
crystal of pure quartz which At the same time your will be using
your left hand to control a stop watch. This process goes on
until the fussy little spot decides it is not going to be controlled by
you any longer but starts to runs off the screen
signaling you to stop your stop watch. that next step is to enter the
time of control into your log book and include the particulars of the
sample etc. You don't do this just once but thousands of time
over a 3 to 5 years period. Added to thrilling job is a
personal sacrifice of no small magnitude. Marie died prematurely because
of here work with radioactive chemicals.
ref(1)This takes experience experimenters with the resource
to acquire or build the and run the equipment. It takes thoughtful direction of
the project management.
Notes
1. basic research
business is to discover ground work the seed the business to continue to solve
most of these problems. but business cant afford to have their present
product obsoleted bby a new scientific discovers unless they own. it that could
force them out of business.
All photos and written material are by Jim & Rhoda Morris
unless noted otherwise. Free personal and educational use and reproduction is
encouraged--- Acknowledgment is appreciated; all commercial rights are reserved
Notice we are not spokesmen for the Mystery of Matter project funded by the
NSF. The views expressed by the authors are our own private point of views. We
just helped out by furnishing instruments and technical advice.
| MADAME CURIE |
by Larry Keegan |
no lovely lady
should hold this power
in her hand
she felt the very fire
of the universe in her fingertips
a warm tremor that
could not be explained
how the world was structured
we did not know
a lovely lady
should not tell us
of the nucleus
of all things
she had not heard of Hiroshima
or Chernobyl
or a beam that radiates
and cured my cancer
lady scientist
in the chambers of time
you will select for us
those substances
contain this secret
source of fire |
oh Marie
oh Marie
unstable nucleus in your hand
You study the electrostatic
see which
substances contain
the unidentified stream
emissions
tell us lady scientist
in science's merky past
which elements radiate
no lovely lady should hold
this power
please tell us, lady
which elements
as you walk towards us
hands folded cup-like
in an offertory
almost a liturgy
bring us the power
cascading from
the alchemy of stars
|
|