Galileo's Telescopes; making them, teaching using them, learning from them.

Teaching Trust in Science?

 Last Revised 05/08/2008 05:45 PM                                                         Hit Counter
Visiting this web site shows your  interest in science and or teaching science, Before  we get into the details of Galileo and his wonderful telescopes.  We invite you to Click here to read a special scientific paper published in Science, May 18, 2007 discussing a serious local and global threat to our science ""Childhood origins of adult resistance to science"? It is coauthored By Paul Bloom and Deena Skolnick Weisberg (Yale) and focuses on neuroscience and evolutionary biology but there is evidence that it's true for most all branches of science including astronomy. We have created our own Abstract of this  important paper for you to consider. The following Includes  text in blue font which are quotes we have taken from the original paper.  The comments in black font are ours.

Paul Bloom and Deena Skolnick Weisberg (Yale)
" It is particularly worrying that national surveys reflect a general decline in the extent to which people trust scientists.  1 in 5 American adults still believe that the Sun revolves around the Earth, which is somewhat shocking—but the same proportion holds for Germany and Great Britain. It is no secret that many American adults reject some scientific ideas. In a 2005 Pew Trust poll, for instance, 42% of respondents said that they believed that humans and other animals have existed in their present form since the beginning of time. Many believe in the efficacy of unproven medical interventions, the mystical nature of out-of-body experiences, the existence of supernatural entities such as ghosts and fairies, and the legitimacy of astrology, ESP, and divination. The list is quite large."

"Given the role of trust in social learning the community of scientists has a legitimate claim to trustworthiness that other social institutions, such as religions and political movements, lack. -The structure of scientific inquiry involves procedures, such as experiments and open debate, that are strikingly successful at revealing truths about the world. All other things being equal, a rational person is wise to defer to a geologist about the age of the earth rather than to a priest or to a politician."

Our comments
The traditional teaching of modern science, has not changed substantially over 400 years, i.e. since Galileo's time.  Despite scientists'  successes in their discoveries they  seem to have failed to generate the  equivalent success in trust of science. This trust is needed by the greater public / Grand Majority to gain their  sustained support and respect A, needed for the basic research that is the life blood of continued growth of our country B,  needed to find solutions for majors problems we face C, and for the employment opportunities of future generations.  This lack of trust has major negative consequences to all of us.

Paul Bloom and Deena Skolnick Weisberg continued.
Even today
"One reason why people resist certain scientific findings, is that many of these findings are unnatural and unintuitive. In some cases, there is such resistance to science education that it never entirely sticks, and foundational biases persist. If this is right, then resistance to science cannot be simply addressed through more education; something different is needed." 

Our comments
The Yale author's concern in their paper, for the wide rejection of some scientific ideas, is shared by many other scientist, education institutions, and to  parents. in this country and abroad.

First question! Is this  a serious problem and if so to who? Answer yes, you. Neglecting  serious support for scientific research you and  your loved ones are on a path with a greater chance of a shorter life  at a minimum will suffer a serious loss in the quality of life.  We need  new discoveries in science to maintain and improve the quality of life.. (The longer the discoveries for cures of  illness's are delayed the more the suffering and death will accrue from them)  the more we negligently mistrust our scientist the smaller the funds for their research.

Second question!
Can we solve the problem of the lack of trust of our scientist?
Yes! Today there exists  more than enough tools, simple enough, cheap enough,  and powerful enough, to effectively increase the trust in science by the Grand Majority  especially children. We must remember that any successful solution, no matter how powerful, will not be a one time fix but has to be applied over and over again.


The next few paragraphs are Work in Progress; there has been no editing  yet, just collecting.
Below is the gist of some important  messages (arguments) and observations that have to be worked out  in words  relieved of  any sense of technical jargon and understandable by  the public and scientist alike.

The points listed below may seem like simple and obvious observations. 

They are not!    Many scientist and teachers of science are so set in tradition they may ya-but these topics to death and in the end keep on teaching in traditional way. This is good and welcomed and faces  the problem   that the mistrust in science is self evident and the traditional way of teaching about science to the greater public has not worked as well as is needed. See Galileo's finger speaking out

There are more and better ways of teaching an appreciation of science and its funding to those in the  majority who do not want to make a career of it. Who find the tech jargon and mathematical descriptions  of how nature works an unnecessary  burden. Science courses  have a way of  lowering ones  grade average without increasing the useful knowledge in everyday living to the abundant and capable public. It may seem quirky but maybe the lack of satisfaction of science,  stressed in the paper above, could be one of resentment of having to take the courses in science  and getting  a less out standing grade coupled with  media's crazy fascination with imaging scientist as personality misfits  than the actual  mistrust of the science.

Those who would create doubt in science  have been unusually, successfully, doing it by using the language of common sense in their arguments to the public and they are winning. (typical example; scientific debate and updating with new data, the success of scientific discovery, is defined as waffling). Also what about  Galileo's finger speaks out.

Its important for teachers of science in the classroom, the museums, the media scientist at large must  use the  same common sense reasoning  and  language to the public in responding  these attacks.  The greater public deserves the  common sense reasons passed on in common sense language to prove that scientific results give the best answers to how things work in nature when compared to answers delivered by businessmen  politicians  and clergy.

Its vitally important to use commonsense evidence to suggest the point that scientist are genetically driven by an overwhelming power of competition to be first and especially to be right in their work.   It is built into most everyone's body chemistry,  especially scientists neurotransmitters to achieve accuracy and honesty in their goal of making new discoveries. They only win this contest to obtaining ever lasting fame and  respect  from one's peers if their discoveries are first to be documented, critiqued. and more than anything else to be right. To be publically wrong or worse if you've mismanaged your measurements is the height of human humiliation  your scientific paper is always there in print for everyone to see  it will continue to torment you for rest of your life and further for the life of the paper it is printed on.

Below is a jumble  of  some  notes, points to be considered?


1; Can we use the evidence that Galileo was one of  many victims of  Aristotle's  poor science. That Galileo nearly lost his life because  of Aristotle's very poor grasp of  simple measurements of length, mass and time. which marks the success of modern science?
2a;Aristotle's  science was so wrong that it set back science for centuries.
3a; He and  his equally science less biographers set up  the Catholic church for a fall. which  has lasted for four centuries and will  continue for many more.
4a' Using this as an example of the need to question the non scientist authors on their accuracy just as the scientist check each other. Do or don't they have to have them meet the  same standards of accuracy as the scientist they are reporting on?

2; Can we use Aristotle as the god of what science is not about?
2a,Isn't he a wonderful example that we can keep on a pedestal  as a God of Gods of how not to do science? An holding him as a champion of how misinformation gets to the only information we trust?

3a, Isn't  Aristotle  pitted against Galileo a good common sense  teaching tool of bad versus good science and how it has been changed through the years by the scientist themselves in their quest of being right with data to prove it.

3b That using ones "feeling" to judge good from bad science?

3;Scientist  have to be and are egocentrics. They simply have no other choice. Its either accuracy or disgrace. Scientist can not bluff their way out of nor escape from public embarrassment from miss management of measurements or unsupported conclusions. There is the written record of their measurements how they were made and their conclusions are open to everyone for inspection. The measurements in the new work have to be right because  they are destined to be   used in future experiments by other scientist. Scientist can only function in accurate environment. Bad measurement means bad conclusions wrong answers no new discoveries and a total waste of time for everyone following them.

The following comments should be consider  as a starting point in building more valuable teaching programs about science  to develop more trust by the majority of the public.

The more practical, honest  and  less  noble side of scientist in their work.

1, There is  intense checking and cross checking  between scientists over their results because the measurements  are used in making new discovery.
2, There is very stiff competition among scientists to be first and test-ably  right.
3, There is a compulsive need to find mistakes in the work of others so that one can discredit their work to let you to be first with the correct  results. 
4, That discoveries are like the links in a chain. these discoveries are published with references connecting the new work with preceding work by others as well as their own and their work will be referenced by others on and on. weak data is soon weeded out.
5, That old links are constantly being updated.
6, That there is an enormous genetic drive to be correct, especially in science where it can and is constantly tested.
7, That "to be right" is like a primeval need we all share and can understand.
        Think about this:  As you read the above statement your first inclination is  to say,  "Oh yeah?         Who says so?"   (:-(   That inclination is the scientist in you, it's in everyone.
8, Scientists make a living  being first and right not first and wrong.
9,That  falsifying any of their  experimental data  it's certain they will be found out and advertized to all They will quickly lose their sponsors, pride and reputation. Further any of the work they have published will be up for even closer inspection or most likely discarded as junk.


It's time for all of us in science to work harder at solving the very serious trust problem discussed in the paper by Paul Bloom and Deena Skolnick Weisberg.  We believe  the Galileo story is one that can be used more universally to help those of us, who love our science, to set the record straight about the issue of trust. Galileo's telescope is a recognizable symbol in this fight for gaining trust. at the same time the presentation telescope is a beautiful work of art and for those who recognize the emotional experience of scientists' preoccupation with being right, it is a powerful drama of one scientist's fight to speak the truth about what he observed. The Galileo story and his instruments can be and are marvelous teaching tools that we can treasure and  use to promote a better understanding of how science works and that its aim is to reveal the truth about the natural world we live in.


Click Picture to see #2428 a
 beautiful hand made gold leaf embossed leather covered instrument. A work of art and science

The Accurate Replication of Both of Galileo's Telescopes'
from 2 scientist point of view

and why
To get a clearer picture of how science and Galileo worked we've also constructed an inclined plane, a cycloid, and a modified  compass/sector calculator  to demonstrate, the broader skill set  that Galileo had  and needed as an experimental scientist studying the laws of gravity and  motion  of bodies  whether they be planets or cannon balls.
 Jim & Rhoda Morris   SciTechAntiques.com   email Galileo@comcast.net  


Click Picture
to see  #2427 an
extraordinary example of Galileo's  development instrument with accessories.

We have dedicated over a thousand hours and considerable personal financial expense to very precisely replicate  Galileo's Telescopes for the IMSS in Florence Italy, the home of the originals and  currently displayed next to the originals, the Griffith Observatory, the Adler Planetarium, and President LB. Johnson's Library. This web site reviews from a scientist's viewpoint their design, their construction and operation as well as their important value in teaching us about the role of science as an institution in serving the whole of society. It could be vitally important  to focus  more clearly and more often with real stories how scientist  as a small and very tight community are forced by nature of the business to work in a  very powerful self policing and correcting system assuring that their and other scientist  data are as free as possible from all errors. We have to stress that  scientist  by their nature and their work are genetically goal driven , in an enormously competitive race with each other , to be  first  and most important  to be right. Their discoveries never stand alone in some journal or text book gathering dust on a shelf. They are tested  again and again by being used to make the next new discovery and next and a next each new discovery being  built on earlier discoveries  like  bricks in a chimney.  We have to drive this process home to all  especially to those which are in the vast majority that are not as close to science as we are. The dramatic story of Galileo and his instruments clearly demonstrates these points. He was  very much in a race with others who were only weeks away from steeling his thunder. Still  in all his hurry his measurements had to be right.  (Note: we used the measurements we made from the originals at the IMSS in Florence Italy in building our instruments. We  thank the staff, in particular Dr. Strano the Curator of the IMSS, for their help in this project)

The year 2009, the International Year of Astronomy, brings with it the 400th anniversary of Galileo’s principal work with the telescope. It can be expected to bring outstanding high profile attention to the Galileo story and his instruments. This story, one of high drama, has born witness, on an international scale, to the struggles that experimental scientists and the institution of science face in gaining acceptance of their discoveries by society and fellow scientists. Read below an excerpt from one of Galileo's letters in which he proposes  a plan to address this difficulty by building many telescopes for people to be able to see what he saw and convince them of his discoveries. This letter was sent to the Tuscan Court  on March 19th

 1610 - Galileo writes;
 

Continuing Galileo's plan we are building museum grade clones of both of Galileo's existing Telescopes. We are making them as authentic as possible so that the public do not  feel they are being duped again with just another almost replica.


IMSS 2428
Click on the picture to enlarge the image

We recommend that everyone  consider the value of joining  the major museums who already have our replicas and  help  Galileo spread the word of how science really works.

We also are providing often neglected  accessories and half models of his telescopes to demonstrate in new ways the details of their internal construction.

We are  making available some additional beautifully finished instruments that Galileo plus was working on such a an inclined plane, 
a  sector/compass and last but not least developed by Kepler etal a brachistochronous .,

For quotes e-mail us at      Galileo@SciTechAntiques.com     or   call us at       781 245 2897  


IMSS 2427
Click on the picture to enlarge the image
click here to visit our site

for more details

Galileo in 1610, faced with criticism of his discoveries, decided to demonstrate the truth about his observations by making more instruments and providing them to his peers and sponsors as teaching tools (ref. 17) .  We are continuing his example today as a positive way to convey the value of the discoveries of science and to highlight  the institution of science as a means of revealing the truths about our world  through the Galileo experience.  Our replicas of Galileo’s telescopes are  beautiful, hand made works of art.  We believe them to be a credit to Galileo for they are precise, museum grade instruments.  We also offer cutaway models to demonstrate the principals of the optics and the very unusual interior construction of the telescopes.  We encourage museums, planetariums, serious collectors and those who so kindly donate instruments of this quality to their favorite museums and teaching institutions to contact us about acquiring them.     For further information please e-mail or phone us  at:
 

Galileo@SciTechAntiques.com       or       call us at 781 245 2897 for details.

 


Below  an extraordinary set of photos showing the world's most exact and complete replicas of the two existing Galilean Telescope at IMSS mounted together on a working modern refractor. On the left are the originals  at IMSS in an older photo
.
Again we are S
Jim & Rhoda Morris of   SciTechAntiques.com     at  Galileo@SciTechAntiques.com  or   781 245 2897
 


Above the very old display that has not been used in years.

Above is the  displayed case with the telescope.  IMSS is  revising  display.

Rhoda and I can not thank the staff of  the INSTITUTE E MUSEO DI STORIA DELLA SCIENZA   Florence Italy enough for their help on our visits to gather data on Galileo Telescope. Most of us cannot appreciate enough  the hard work and dedication  of the museum staff behind the scenes that preserve and prepare for display those precious things that demonstrate so well the positive attributes of the scientific community.
This is a beautiful Museum  for art lovers and scientist alike. The Instrument are truly works of art  which  also have had a major influence on our quality of life.


Objective end. The telescopes were mounted on a modern refractor for comparing the images and illustrating the mechanical differences.


Eyepiece end of our replicas

 

This web site is large with many  pictures and discussions. It contains several major topics.

1, The construction details of our replicas.  The details of the originals at IMSS Florence Italy .
2,  It includes what one really sees looking  through Galileo's telescope, the reason Galileo chose a negative lens for his eyepieces, how people understood how things in nature worked in 1600 and compared to today?
3, One of our goals has been the development of a clearer understanding of Galileo as a technologist as viewed by two modern day professional technologist  a comparison of the stark business of science then and today.
4,Why these telescopes are so important as  teaching tools in today's environment and why we have worked so hard to make them as close to the originals as possible.

Comments are welcome Galileo@scitechantiques.com


Links  to Galileo, His original telescopes, replicas and about Galileo

Researching and Evaluating the Literature for the dimensional data needed to build the replica
Will the Real Galileo Galilei  Please Stand Up Please
The data for precisely replicating  these telescopes. 

 

Replicating the laboratory telescope  IMSS INV # 2427
Construction details of  the Laboratory Telescope for the Adler Planetarium


The Construction data  and details of IMSS INV #2428      red leather presentation telescope
Studying
Galileo's Original telescope in detail disclosed a unique resin composite construction.
The telescope optics important choices

Overall length of telescope determined by the optics and making them.
The over all Important art work

Applying The Impressions


What Does All This Mean, Why Should We Care, Galileo as a
Teacher,

Basic research scientist, 
Applied scientist,
Engineer and product development
Entrepreneur

The Galilean Syndrome
The Value of Basic Scientific Research
Photos of our telescopes being used

Jim & Rhoda Morris  Comments invited, e-mail k1ugm@comcast.net  781 245 2897
05/08/2008 05:45:04 PM Latest up date 

A abstract
 We have replicated, with great care, Galileo's  two internationally famous
Telescopes. We based our replicas on  data we measured from the two originals which are attributed to Galileo and are on display at  IMSS in Florence Italy. Our replica's of INV # 2428.  are complete with their gilded leather covering  even  duplicating their  very unusual  thin-stave internal construction, something that has not been done before.  We made five 2428 telescopes, three instrument for IMSS, the museum that has the originals. With one of these being  scheduled to be put on display at the Patti Palace Florence February 2008. Two  are split in half showing the  internal construction and will be part of the display containing the original. We have made another that is on  display at the Griffith Observatory (see photo below)

We also constructed three   INV#2427  The equally perhaps most interesting laboratory type telescope.  One for the Adler Planetarium another President  L. B. Johnson library. The original  is a very rare and valuable telescope because seldom are the developing instruments kept. They are crude tattered and torn often modified over and over again for various experiments and after having served their purpose are usually cast in the junk heap. So we are particularly favored to have a prime example of one to replicate. We can also replicated a typical replication of Galileo's micrometer for measuring the  paths of the moon's of Jupiter, the relationship of shape and power of various eyepiece lenses and the distance of Jupiter's moons  from the planet. The telescope  has a split wood tube  covered with paper painted  and reinforced with wire reproducing each part of the instruments  to be as  close as possible to the originals. Each telescope was  assembled  by hand as they were in Galileo's day. Our  dimensional accuracy has been kept to within a few percent in all cases and in some instance's to  fractions of a millimeter of  the  originals. We also chose not to antique them but to show them  as they would have looked when new.

Because our replicas are   accurately reproduced they are  particularly useful  as research, teaching, and display tools. One can see, feel, and operate them as Galileo saw, felt and operated them. This tactile experience high lights more accurately  their virtues and their  faults giving  a more mature insight into 1609 telescope making and operation that Galileo, his associates and customers experienced. It also demonstrates Galileo's role as both  a scientist and entrepreneur and how little the business of science has changed in over 400 years.
 

The telescopes are high museum grade replicas and very rare.  The leather covered telescope, the  replica of  IMSS inv #2428, has over 100 pieces  and  is embossed with over 400 gilding die strikes. It has  very unusual construction features both inside and out, with an  optical power of 21. The replica of  IMSS inv. 2427 represents a construction style commonly used in research / field grade telescopes for that time period.  It has nearer 17  pieces and  a power of 14. The pair complement each other, one a presentation piece designed for people of power and influence ,the other a field type instrument for  customer or colleague.

Achieving  this high level of accuracy in the reproduction of these telescopes was through the patience and  very professional help of  the staff at IMSS in Florence Italy, the staff of the Griffith Observatory, and the staff of Adler Planetarium with their interesting replicas made by Cipriani. They made it possible for us to make measurements and make   high resolution photos of  the originals and some Cipriani replica telescopes. They also shared  their considerable experience of  these instruments with us.

We found It was absolutely essential to  make our own measurements of the original  having found a number of important differences in the data for dimensions and materials in the  published literature  and   some exiting replicas. We made a concerted effort in checking and cross checking our data  in  resolving  these differences.  It is important to note in our comparison that we distinguished data between Galileo type telescopes and those reporting to be Galilean replicas. For those instances where there was no data  such as the  eyepiece holder in IMSS 2528 we made and noted our best guess.  based on our
technical experience  which is considerable. Last but not least  In the virtually all cases it is  possible to make simple modification to our replica telescope if necessary to accommodate any  new  and more reliable information  if it becomes available.

The bottom line is that our replicas are the most accurate and finest made to date and will hopefully serve as  standards for other replication in the future.
From our technical point of view researching  and building a number of Galileo instruments we saw Galileo and his telescopes as remarkable and timeless examples of what the business of science is  all about.  Galileo and his instruments is a  first rate case study of science, technology and its support. There is much to learn for our future from his story and his instruments but  we  first  have to deSobelize our selves.  Below is an outline and some simple, at times stretched, examples of Galileo practicing technology as seen from  fellow technologist point to view.

One will  find  some gross faults (most  Jim's) in our grammar our spelling  on this web site  we apologize for them. Our choice of examples and our reason for making them we believe are  solid,  We can only hope that you the  reader  gets at least an inkling of how important the  case study of Galileo and the business of science is.  That it helps  us understand what basic research is all about, how important it is and that it will  encourage  some to join the effort of bringing the
Galilean Syndrome under control so our scientist can bring  us to fuller understanding of our selves, the  universe we live in and depend upon.

Most scientists we hope will  recognized  themselves in many ways as the Galileo's  of today.
We encourage those who have been taking a back seat to come forward and help.    TLM

We have made five of the leather telescopes and three of the wood and paper covered on one  of each of these telescope for our collection
 They have been well received along with our perception of the  Galilean Syndrome  by magazines, TV programs and talks at Harvard Observatory and Bunker Hill College    See the photos below.

The date that this page has been last edited 05/08/2008

 

Click picture to enlarge it

Details of Galileo's 2428 telescope  original and its replica made for the IMSS, Institute and Museum of the History of Science Florence Italy where the originals are kept and on display, The Griffith Observatory in California  both are  covered in great detail in this website. Many details  covered are relevant to the 2427 as well.
Click Here  for Galileo's 2427 telescope original and replica made for Adler Planetarium Chicago ILL. Its covered in great detail on its web site
Click Here  Dimensional errors in the literature of Galileo's telescopes required us to go to Florence Italy and make measurements of the original.
Click Here A more detailed analysis for errors in the literature especially in  the optics and what one really see's when looking through Galileo's telescope is demonstrated and discussed.
Click Here  for a more concise description of these two telescopes

 Below What Galileo's Telescopes Most Likely Looked Like When They Were New!
 
There Are No Words Powerful Enough To Express The Importance Of Basic Scientific Research

Click on the telescope to enlarge it then click on the image again to in large it  to 2469x277 pixels
A large picture of Galileo's telescope IMSS # 2428
Click on the hyperlink to see the original   IMSS INV #2428
Stay on this site to look at the detail of replicating this telescope IMSS # 2428

Click on the telescope to in large it then click on the image again to in large it  to 2558x147pixels Picture of Galileo's wood and paper telescope IMSS2427
Click on the hyperlink to see the original  IMSS INV #2427
Click Here to go to our web site covering this telescope IMSS # 2427.

Below are some photos of our telescopes, the people they have met and the places they have visited.
 

Picture of replica of Galileo's red leather telescope IMSS2428
This telescope is hand made and based on  data we measured from the original at IMSS Florance Italy. It has over 100 pieces. It is covered with leather which is embossed with pure Gold leaf  using over 20 dies, faithfully following the impressions of the original, with 400 individual gilding die strikes. It is truly a striking work of art as well  as a tactile time capsule giving one a feeling of awe while handling it.  It is  a superb teaching tool.. The telescope is so similar in every detail to the original that it's like stepping into a time machine and journeying back into the past. We even felt a little nervous while filming a church steeple scene through our telescope for the TV Discovery Channel wondering whether an official from the church might take an  overt interest in us and our telescope!
During our research and fabrication, which took nearly a year,  Galileo's guiding  sprit always seemed to be with us. For those who care,  he was very good company, handy around the shop but had a mischievous sprit as one  might guess from the twinkle in his eye.

  Last Revised 05/08/2008 05:45:04 PM EST

Above a direct comparison of our replica of IMSS 2428 with the original  at Florence Italy

Below  a photo history of our replicas
|

Dr. Giorgio Strano - Curator of IMSS, the museum where Galileo's telescopes are kept on display. He  is looking out over Florence's roof tops  from the top of IMSS building,  using our  precisely made  replica of IMSS 2428 just as Galileo Galilei might have done with one of the original telescopes some 400 years ago.

Rhoda co builder of our replica checking out the quality of the image


Dava Sobel author of the  very interesting book "Galileo's Daughter" looking through our replica sharing the experience that Galileo would have had using his telescope. The photo was taken during  the conference of the  History of Astronomy Workshop at Notre Dame July 2007
 


The  replica of Galileo telescope we fabricated
now at  the very beautiful Griffith Observatory ready to do its job for the museum's staff  to help you appreciate and learn even more about the value of science. It's ever so gently  being
held by Mark Pine the Deputy Executive
Director of the "Friends of  The Observatory".

Griffith



Above our replica  telescope we built  on display at the Griffith Observatory
Adler

Michelle Nichols Master Educator Adler Planetarium & Astronomy Museum in Chicago Illinois  checking out  Adler's new replica of Galileo's telescope IMSS 2427. which was   precisely made  to the specifications of Galileo's original telescope.

Dr. Paul H. Knappenberger jr. President Adler Planetarium & Astronomy Museum checking out  our two replicas of Galileo's telescopes with Galileo, Jim and Rhoda looking on in the background.
 

Samples of the Media's Interest

The objective end of our replica showing the  layers of planking that make up the lens holder. The gold decoration has not been applied yet.  Steven A. Simpson photographer of the magazine "Night Sky" taking picture of the  objective end of our replica without the gold decorations for an article by Jim Quinn "Stargazing with Galileo". May/June issue "Night Sky".

One of our two replicas of Galileo's Telescope being filmed on set for its first public appearance on Cable TV From left to right are director of photography Boyd Estus of Heliotrope Studios Ltd., Hunter Ellis host of the History Channel's "Man Motion. Machines" Series and Rhoda and Jim Morris of scitechantiques.com co-maker of the telescope

 

Note the Camera/Telescope set-up for filming the image as actually seen through the replica of Galileo's telescope We had to make a special mount to couple the very fragile very rare 12 oz telescope to the very expensive 42 pound camera to give the TV audience a feeling for the image quality Galileo worked with as he scanned around the neighborhood through the astounding instrument that brought the "far away so much closer"

Filming one of the scenes of Jim Morris and Hunter Ellis chatting about Galileo's telescope and how it works

 

One of our replicas is at the Griffith Observatory the other is playing its  first acting job of the history channel. Below are some pictures from the set of History Channels  "Man Moment & Machine"

The crew Gathered together watching the monitor displaying the image from the telescope Third from the right is our Producer/ Writer of the History Channel 's Man Moment. Machine Julie Mirocha. Rhoda is taking the picture.



Meet the principal members of the replicating team


Jim basic and applied research physicist on temporary duty as apprentice to Galileo.


Rhoda Basic and applied research chemist on temporary duty as apprentice to Galileo.


Galileo Senior member of the team working toward getting  more  help for funding and more   support for  basic research.

 Again read below an excerpt from one of Galileo's letters in which he proposes  a plan to build  many telescopes for people to be able to see what he saw and convince them of his discoveries. This  letter  was sent to the Tuscan Court  on March 19th 1610 - Galileo  writes;

\

Galileo's job is not finished

While researching and replicating  Galileo's Telescopes  We discovered another replication  that was taking place, which was  the replication of  the lack of support  of basic research in science today, especially in the U.S.A. , Just as there was lack of support 400 years ago.

A recent informal survey conducted by the authors of over 400 people  indicates that almost 80 % of the people on the street when asked do  scientist lie in their published papers said yes!

Galileo's story on an international bases is  a well documented case study, reminding  us  that these  telescopes  stand as  symbols  of  a long held  prejudicial miss understanding against basic research. 
We are all victims  waiting on  the side lines while the various factions in this  debate  work out their differences so that we can get on with the basic scientific research and turn this knowledge  into ways that will give us   a fuller, healthier, safer life as it already has shown that it can do.

The authors suggest that Galileo---- this one man---- and his telescopes  represents in a simple, elegant  and dramatic and  important way,  all the aspects of what technology and its mistrusting antagonists are about in 1600 and to day. One is compelled to ask Isn't it the time for both sides to work together to gain a better understanding  of each others point of view with data so we can work out a compromise  that we can  resolve  this dilemma and  we can get on with the research we all so badly need.

There is a beautiful case study buried in  this 400 year old   story that is both unique and valuable because each phase of the complex and often hidden important business of doing  basic research is all  rolled into one type of instrument and one  scientist. All the tasks of doing science are being   played by  one actor, in a one act, one prop play   with  Galileo playing  all the parts. Today research is done by teams of scientist and  has  become very complicated to extract out the many steps needed to understand  how  discoveries are made and used i.e.  the business of  basic scientific research. Unfortunately the dialog for such a  play  is spread thought out the literature filled with errors of a personalized nature waiting to be complied into a single script  minus all the media melodrama that clouds the issues.

This web site suggest that Galileo's story as told through the telescopes can stands as a mile post  showing us what is going on today by looking at 1600 AD  and measuring our  progress  and understanding of this  prejudice  that sadly  still exist today, which we call the Galilean syndrome.
 

400 Years Ago 1600
A dramatic picture, a dramatic story, a dramatic lesson for all of us In the 21st century

News flash
 Galileo Galilei SCIENCE TEACHER on trial FOR TEACHING THE EARTH CIRCLES SUN -- faces being BURNED
ALIVE AT THE STAKE
  
Warning:  Pernicious Galilean Syndrome, a dangerous myopic anti science disease is again infecting our society

 

400 years later 2000 +
A dramatic picture, a dramatic story, a dramatic lesson for all of us In the 21st century

 James-E-Hansen-NASA29jan06.jpg
News flash
James Hansen, director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies  on trial before the U.S.  congress for warning the public that  man is making the earth  dangerously warmer. If  true who will be faced  being burned at the stake this time?

One of the country's leading climate scientists, has testified "the White House (Politicians & Oil Companies) repeatedly tried to control what government scientists say to the public and media about climate change."  It has been reported that 181 changes were made  by non science political appointed officials,  to three scientific climate reports reflecting a consistent attempt to emphasize the uncertainties surrounding the science of climate change and undercut the broad conclusions that man-made emissions are warming the earth. Hansen also said "Interference with communications of science to the public has been greater during the current administration than at any time in my career,"
Warning:  Is the Pernicious Galilean Syndrome, a dangerous myopic               anti science disease  still infecting our society?


 

Symbols of Progress and the Galilean Syndrome?  


 
The Galilean Syndrome

Galileo's telescopes  are especially important today because they stand out as  symbols  warnings  us to keep   constant vigil against those that would  turn us away from science, its methods and tools.

The Pernicious Galilean Syndrome its always there!
The support and funding of basic scientific research so vital to us in the U.S. and the world, has come under attack again by a few powerful, charismatic,  zealous, leaders  repeating the same mistakes of myopic  judgment  that  Galileo  had to contend with 400 years ago,

In spite of science's success it is always vulnerable to influential misguided leaders ready to summon their followers to take our basic scientific research away from us. These followers go after their congresspersons threatening their reelection for supporting science. Although relatively small in number they are well organized have proven to be very effective.

Scientist  can not solve  the  problems they are given without adequate funding. They need our help and support.  There are so few scientists compared to the world's population including the very active dissenters that their warnings and cries for help are too weak to be heard by the general public.

The cure  for
Pernicious Galilean Syndrome takes less than five minutes a year; Most of us do not appreciate that we are  automatically part of the science team.  We  don't need a degree in science or take courses in science to be a  very important contributor to the progress of

The Beautiful Home of Galileo's Telescopes

science and their are allot of us on the team.  However, we do need to stop taking science for granted and we do need to  actively start supporting  it!

As members of the science team we have a vital role.
We need to bring to the attention of our congressman  the  critical need for our government to strengthen its  interest and support for  basic scientific research.   All aspects of our future depends on it.

Yes most of us understand the value of basic scientific research.   Yes we are large in numbers, and want it supported, but we must be vigilant, contacting our congressman showing our support in numbers that at least match the dissenters.

Galileo's famous and dramatic telescope story is repeating itself today and we as well as the dissenters are the victims of this Pernicious Galilean Syndrome.

In the foto above is part of the team  Jim & Rhoda, best of  friends, husband and wife,  grandpa and grandma, physicist and chemist, hanging around  Galileo's neighborhood.  Here we are in front of  the extraordinary museum where Galileo Galilei's telescopes, his other famous instruments, and his index finger reside.  The museum lies on the banks of the beautiful Arno River in Florence.  Galileo  is  buried just down the street and  is still teaching science (and the danger of  Pernicious Galilean Syndrome) to the public visiting his stylish crypt in the  Santa Croce Church.  He and his telescopes are still in there fighting for science. Don't let him down. Join him in the fight

More Detail on how you can help

Ref.** 

Detail on how you can help



More Detail on how you can help


Galileo and his telescopes the important technical and cultural issues surrounding them in1609

Our goal  is to help readers to enjoy the new information on the construction details of Galileo's telescopes  their  optics and  the  scientific anomalies that Galileo dealt with in designing and building his high powered telescopes i.e. why he really developed them and how.

Even though there is a 400 year time gap between Galileo and the authors . we  found ourselves being  drawn into a close personal and professional  relationship with Galileo or at least his spirit while working on the replication of his telescopes   He seemed to always be at our side judging our work piece by piece even the inner most details of his instruments. Galileo grew into more than  a colleague for us, but a friend with an agenda of pushing us to build his telescopes to the highest quality standard so  they might act as symbols of one of  sciences most  dramatic stories  highlighting the dangers to our science from  leaders endowed with poor judgment in matters of science who assume  control of our science. to our detriment. When we shipped our replicas off to Griffith observatory we felt very much like we were shipping the spirit of Galileo  with them. When they were gone our shop/lab felt strangely empty. It was only after our telescope returned from its journey to California and back and we could give it a little pat now and then that the lab felt more complete.

Our web site  takes you on a step by step tour of the construction, the surprises and the frustrations of building a truly precise and high quality  replica for  very high quality museums. We take you on tour into bowels of the telescope wherever very  few have been before. Experience the personal design and political choices Galileo built into these telescopes and why.

We provide for you  a very rich example of what it is really like to look through Galileo's telescope  and you will be shocked at  the  very tiny speck of light  from a  window  far off in the distance of  a very large  dark cavern. You will develop a  great respect for Galileo's masterful skills as the first observer of the heavens, seeing them as no one else had ever  seen them before.



The following section speaks to the techno-political issues of why  we feel that Galileo and his telescopes are so important in today's environment. We state the ground rules we  set for ourselves in this project, and give what we feel is a more experienced informed look into Galileo's  technical and judgment skills. We also express our views of Galileo's most important and unique contribution  to days science which goes far beyond his celestial discoveries.



Back ground information for studying  Galileo's Technical decisions

The following section gives a brief  a description  of the technical environment, the tools that were being  used to explain how nature worked that Galileo struggled with in earning a living



The Nonsense of Common Sense Is it in our Gene's?

We start with  comparing the tools of common sense used in 1600 with  tools of the scientific method during its earlier stages of its development.

A statement and a question. Two lenses plus a narrow cylinder three feet long, with a total weight of less than a 12 ounces is all that one needs to build a Galilean telescope, It seems so simple yet caused so much trouble for a major church of the day and the scientific community. Lenses had been around for centuries as eye glasses. Why weren't higher power telescopes invented earlier?

 The following example is certainly part of the answer. Below we give two  simple demonstration of the old way "common sense" was used to solve or couldn't solve problems and how it came to be recognized as the non sense of common sense which was contributing toward the slowing of the progress of finding out how things really worked.

Up until the time of Galileo common sense was virtually the only tool of choice to explain how things worked. Some people might like to call it logic?. Common sense had the advantage of being simple to use. It was a one liner tool that anyone  used  It didn't take much work to make up one liners. Using common sense one didn't need to take hours making quantitative repeatable measurements to take a position of authority. One didn't need to have your competitors review your conclusions for flaws in measurement and reasoning because there would be no reliable measurement. You didn't need them. You just used common sense with the right tone of voice or pen.

1 ST.  example Lets look at a simple example being dealt with in the religion---techo commonsense debate going on at the time showing  the type of common sense that Galileo and those that were around him at the time had to deal with.

  • It was common sense that told us that the sun went around the earth.
  • Everyone could see it go around.
  • Everyone with common sense knew that it was very hard to move  rocks to build a pyramid and it would take allot more  to move the earth.
  • Obviously the earth was just too big to move.
  • Besides you would feel it moving if it was .
  • One could see that the sun was smaller so it had to be the sun that moved.
  • Mathematical formula which very few understood suggested that the simple retrograde motion of some of the planets could  be explained if every thing went around the sun but common sense told many that  mathematics' could not be trusted, which most believe to this day especially when it comes to statistics, and they say it with great gusto and assurances.

On and on with reason after reason It was just common sense ...... 

2 nd. example, The Politics of Optics Galileo the Engineer and Entrepreneur

Galileo as a businessman; The authors comments on The business of basic research 1600 and 2006


The challenges of replicating  Galileo's existing telescopes and judging his technical skills requires a  perspective of why he was building them and for whom he was building them. This knowledge is critical in judging Galileo's skills as a Scientist/ Engineer/Entrepreneur. (Yes we have to remember that Galileo was an entrepreneur earning monies to support his research and family needs just scientist do today.) The decorative red leather telescope and it negative lens with its limited field of view but upright image most likely was an experienced business decision on Galileo's part.  The red leather telescope should be  considered as  part of his  product line of technical instruments for sale or bartering. The very beautiful art work would hardly have  been put on one of his data gathering instrument for his own research. Its seemly compromised optical design  the poor field of view yet high magnification with a short over all length reflects  his customer needs not a design flaw from a lack of Galileo's skills in optical design as some have suggested in the literature.

 

What was the challenge to Galileo as he designed his high powered telescope? How did he do it?

Below are three remarkable  experimental observations where common sense seemly makes no sense when it comes to optics. Here Galileo used the scientific method in designing his telescopes to get past this anomaly  created by ones visual senses.

1 ST. observation of the magic of lenses; The lens on your right of the above photo  is the kind of lens used as an eyepiece in a Galilean telescope. Look at the eye in the photo notice how much smaller the eye and face look through that eyepiece lens. Now Galileo found with measurements that the telescope becomes more powerful and makes distant things look bigger by selecting a lens for the eyepieces that makes things look smaller, " Smaller?" It doesn't make common sense that you would use a lens that makes things look smaller to get a telescope to make things look bigger. . Lets go through that once more if we used a lens that made the eye looks even smaller than the one in the photo the telescope that would make things through the telescope look even bigger. "Smaller is bigger" Hmmmmmmmmm? .

2 nd. observation of the magic of lenses: . The lens on your left is the kind of lens used as an objective. It goes on the far end of the telescope gathering the light from the object and sends it to the eyepiece. Galileo found from his measurements that the weaker its magnifying power is (as long its greater than 1) the stronger the telescope "Weaker is stronger" Where is the common sense of that? Again note the lens on the left in the above picture makes the eye look bigger Galileo found that that was not good. One needs to pick a lens for the objective that would hardly change the size of the eye when held close to the eye to the make things in the distance really big. Low power lens makes hi power telescope. The focal length of the objective on this telescope below was 60 foot the lens was very weak but made objects come in very big? Where is the common sense in that. But it works see photo below.

 

3rd observation of the magic of lenses: Looking through the telescope from the objective end through the eyepiece, everything looks smaller rather than bigger. That certainly not something anyone using common sense would have guessed. Could it be that Galileo's critics were and still are  looking through the wrong end of the telescope and therefore couldn't and can't see what Galileo was seeing. Could it be that the critics of science today are looking through their telescopes from the wrong end?

So  in and around 1609 one of the first popularly dramatic examples of using the scientific method showed that common sense made no sense in the designing and building  the telescope nor interpreting what you saw through the telescope. Galileo decided and demonstrated that its far more productive to use this newly invented tool to design his telescope, the scientific method! The new tool he used was based on  the measurement of length mass time then with mathematics as his language he could  more reliably explain how things really work. Galileo used the scientific method to get past the magical tricks that lenses seemed to play on observer's eyes  and mind described above thus finding the better way to make a telescope.

So here we have the  1609 environment that Galileo worked in. The leaders and their followers  had little to no experience in how things in nature worked they assumed it was just common sense, accept when employing natures secrets  to  inventions of war and political control. Sounds like what still goes on to day.
But first and more important thing  to learn is how basic research scientist work, how they  get the research funds  to do their work and support themselves and family. Let us look at why Galileo his telescopes and the American military decided to spend  time and money designing and building  the Hubble and other orbiting telescopes.
Was it to explore the heavens and make new discoveries?